iNet_forum_header_100112
Canon USA
Reply
New Contributor
Bob0920
Posts: 1
Registered: ‎12-05-2012

EF-S IS II vs. EF-S IS STM

What's the difference between a EF-S IS II lens, and a EF-S IS STM? Is the STM worth approximately $150 more than the IS II? Thanks, Bob

 

Please use plain text.
Frequent Contributor
Scatterbrained
Posts: 57
Registered: ‎11-19-2012

Re: EF-S IS II vs. EF-S IS STM

I think you're getting a little confused here.   STM is a type of focus system, like the ring USM in L lenses.  The II (2) just denotes that it's the second iteration of a certain lens.   For example, 24-70 f/2.8L and 24-70 f/2.8 L II.   Knowing whether or not the STM focus is better than whatever other lens you're looking at would first require us to know what it's being compared to.

Please use plain text.
New Contributor
rnagamalla
Posts: 1
Registered: ‎08-20-2013

Re: EF-S IS II vs. EF-S IS STM

I have an EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II Lens and I want to know the difference between this and EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Lens.

Please use plain text.
Respected Contributor
ebiggs1
Posts: 1,421
Registered: ‎12-07-2012

Re: EF-S IS II vs. EF-S IS STM

I don't have the STM lens but from what my movie making friends tell me, it is faster at focusing and quieter. Both of which make better movies. I guess still photographers would benefit from faster focusing too. If I had the IS II version I would not go out and buy the STM version. But if you didn't already have it, than sure, it's probably the way to go.

EOS 1D, EOS 1D Mk II, EOS 1D Mk II N, EOS 1D Mk III,
24-70mm f2.8 L, 70-200mm f2.8 L
CS6, ACR 8.3, Lightroom 5.3
Please use plain text.
Reputable Contributor
Skirball
Posts: 833
Registered: ‎02-28-2013

Re: EF-S IS II vs. EF-S IS STM

Note that with STM the focus ring is electronic.  This means that if you use manual focus you turn the ring to activate a motor that then seeks focus, instead of a direct mechanical link like in a traditional lens.  There’s a bit of a delay.  I think it’d bother me, but others might like it.

 

I’ve read good reviews on the 18-135 STM, but the primes don’t seem like the AF speed is anything amazing.

Please use plain text.
Reputable Contributor
TCampbell
Posts: 959
Registered: ‎06-11-2013

Re: EF-S IS II vs. EF-S IS STM

You can watch (and hear) the difference.  Here's a YouTube video I stumbled across:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tm8C76c-jtA

 

The 18-135mm STM is quiet to the point that I cannot hear a thing.  The 40mm makes a _very_ slight hum.  The 18-135 non-STM makes quite a racket and is very slow.

 

Unfortunately the person recording the video to compare the focus speed of a lens with USM motors.  Those lenses tend to be QUITE snappy.

 

The USM lenses allow for full-time manual focus even when in auto-focus mode because of how the system works.  You can think of the focus ring as mechanically engaging the focus... but with a "clutch" adjusted to allow slippage.  The regular lenses (non-USM and non-STM) use gears -- there is no slippage and Canon recommends against attempting to focus the lens manually if it's in "AF" mode.  The STM lenses allow for full-time (well... semi-full-time) manual focus with the caveat that there is actually no mechanical linkage to the focus system at all... it's completely focus-by-wire.  So when you turn the focus (manually) you're really just sending commands to the computer to move the focus mechanism.  This means the camera has to be "awake" to operate the lens (whereas with other lenses you can even focus the lens when the camera is completely powered off.)  

 

Tim Campbell
5D II, 5D III, 60Da
Please use plain text.